At fivethirtyeight.com, Harry Enten noted
that the exit polls showed Trump winning 29 percent of the Hispanic vote, which
was better than Romney’s 27 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2012. Taking issue
with the exit polls, Gary Segura and Matt Barreto argued that Clinton did
better than Obama, receiving nearly 80 percent of the Hispanic vote. Enten also
considered Clinton’s performance among Hispanics in six counties with more than
90 percent Hispanic populations, claiming that Clinton underperformed in those
counties compared to Obama in 2012.
Here’s the excerpt:
Sources: ABC News, Census Bureau
Clinton didn’t underperform everywhere. Latino Decisions
points to a number of heavily Latino precincts in Chicago, Los Angeles County
and Miami-Dade County (which has a heavily Cuban population) where Clinton
outperformed Obama. She also did better in El Paso and San Antonio, Texas,
which were not specifically highlighted by Latino Decisions. Those are all
heavily populated areas, unlike some of the rural Texas counties where she
underperformed. It’s possible that Clinton’s strength in those larger counties
was enough to make her nationwide margin among Latinos wider than Obama’s. But
even in the few areas where Clinton outperformed Obama, she rarely did so by as
much as we would expect if Clinton improved her margin among Latinos by as much
as Latino Decisions found in their survey.
Barreto said Latino Decisions is primarily concerned with
determining the share of the Latino vote that Clinton and Trump won, not how
this year’s outcome compares to 2012’s. “We’re not necessarily interested in
comparisons to Obama, although that will eventually be part of our story,”
Barreto said. “We’re just trying to estimate what Clinton’s vote share was and
what Trump’s vote share was in 2016 on Election Day.”
The county-level data also points to a larger issue:
Clinton did significantly worse than Obama overall, both nationally and in most
individual counties. That means that to have won Latinos by a larger margin
than Obama — and especially to have won by 9 points more, as Latino Decisions’
data implies — Clinton would have to be finding much more support among that
group than Obama did even as evidence suggests she got less support from every
other racial and ethnic demographic. County-level election results suggest
Clinton lost less ground among Latinos than among other demographic groups,
especially non-Hispanic whites, but she still seems to have lost ground, not gained
it.
Voting results don’t prove that Clinton did worse than
Obama among Latinos, or that Trump did better than Romney. But the results do
suggest that if nearly 80 percent of Latinos voted for Clinton, as Latino
Decisions argues, then Latino turnout must have been down in many counties, or
Clinton must have done much worse than Obama among non-Latinos in those
counties. Otherwise, the overwhelming pro-Clinton Latino vote would have swung
heavily Latino counties more dramatically toward Clinton. The evidence, then,
suggests that Clinton fell short among Latinos in one of two ways: Either she
didn’t win as large a share of them as Obama, or she didn’t convince as many of
them to turn out to vote. Since both the exit
polls
and Latino
Decisions agree that turnout among Latinos was up, the latter
explanation doesn’t seem likely.
Let’s take a closer look at the
six counties and the performance of the candidates in 2016 vs. 2012. According
to the exit
polls, Trump received 34 percent of the Hispanic vote in Texas, and Clinton
earned 61 percent. The table contains the information on the six counties used
by Enten, but it also adds several counties where Hispanics make up a large
percentage of the voting age population and, more importantly, contributed a
significant portion of the total presidential vote in Texas.
In the far right
column—labeled Clinton or Obama—the positive percentage indicates that the
difference between Obama’s percentage of the vote and Romney’s percentage of
the vote was better than the difference between Clinton’s percentage of the
vote and Trump’s percentage of the vote for that county. A negative percentage
in that column indicates that the difference between Obama’s percentage of the
vote and Romney’s percentage of the vote was worse than the difference between
Clinton’s percentage of the vote and Trumps percentage of the vote. Note that
Clinton bested Obama in two of Enten’s six counties and in average of the six
counties. Among the larger counties with high percentages of Hispanic voting
age populations, Clinton bested Obama in four of the five counties and in the
average for the counties. Also, note that Romney beat Obama by 3.32 percent in Nueces
County in 2012, and Trump beat Clinton by 1.50 percent in 2016. Also, Nueces
County has the lowest percentage of Hispanic voting age population of the
eleven counties.
The data for these eleven counties demonstrate that Trump
did not best Romney in terms of percentage of the Hispanic Vote in these Texas
counties.
No comments:
Post a Comment