Although Austin city council elections are nonpartisan, the
highly-charged politics that envelop Austin have turned several city council
runoffs into partisan affairs. In southwest Austin, District 8 candidates Ellen
Troxclair and Ed Scruggs epitomize the partisan conflict also evident in some other
districts. In a recent Austin
American-Statesmen, Marty Toohey highlights the nature of the conflict by
listing the endorsements for each candidate:
Their endorsements further underscore
their differences. Scruggs’ include Central Austin Democrats, the Austin
Progressive Coalition, and the next Travis County judge, Sarah Eckhardt, a
hard-charging liberal who won her November election in a landslide. Troxclair’s
include Republican Travis County Commissioner Gerald Daugherty, the Home
Builders Association of Greater Austin and a rare local endorsement from Texans
for Fiscal Responsibility, Michael Quinn Sullivan’s influential group; one of
her campaign fliers encouraged voters to pick Republicans Greg Abbott (for
governor), Dan Patrick (for lieutenant governor) and herself.
In the November 4 election, Troxclair won a position in the
runoff election by garnering 26.38 percent of the vote. Ed Scruggs won 25.55
percent of the vote, which secured him a place in the runoff. Of the five
candidates in District 8, there were two Republicans—Troxclair and Bray—and
three Democrats—Scruggs, Pierce, and May. Of the five candidates, only two
emphasized their partisanship, and they were the candidates who will compete in
the runoff election.
Since this is the first runoff election under the 10-1 plan,
there are many unknowns: What will be the turnout? What will be the composition
of the electorate? Which party is favored in the district? I’ll consider each
question, starting with the one about which we know the most—the last question.
According to the Austin
American-Statesman, District 8 is a swing district. Indeed, in 2012,
President Barack Obama won 51.54 percent of the vote to Romney’s 48.46 percent.
However, in 2014, Democrat Wendy Davis won the district with 55.10 percent of
the vote to Republican Greg Abbott’s 44.90 percent of the vote. Table 1 shows
the 2014 gubernatorial vote in each of the precincts in the district:
Table 1: Gubernatorial
Vote in City of Austin District 8 in 2014.
Voter Precinct
|
Greg Abbott
|
Wendy
Davis
|
ST
Rep
|
% RV
Gov
|
ST
Dem
|
% DV Gov
|
301
|
164
|
346
|
74
|
45.12%
|
170
|
49.13%
|
302
|
759
|
780
|
322
|
42.42%
|
324
|
41.54%
|
303
|
742
|
684
|
361
|
48.65%
|
319
|
46.64%
|
304
|
1,041
|
1,095
|
493
|
47.36%
|
448
|
40.91%
|
307
|
434
|
459
|
182
|
41.94%
|
242
|
52.72%
|
314
|
1,451
|
811
|
834
|
57.48%
|
337
|
41.55%
|
315
|
843
|
1,001
|
395
|
46.86%
|
408
|
40.76%
|
317
|
729
|
725
|
321
|
44.03%
|
310
|
42.76%
|
330
|
806
|
649
|
353
|
43.80%
|
280
|
43.14%
|
338
|
1,119
|
1,266
|
554
|
49.51%
|
585
|
46.21%
|
339
|
311
|
627
|
135
|
43.41%
|
269
|
42.90%
|
347
|
701
|
773
|
284
|
40.51%
|
328
|
42.43%
|
349
|
919
|
1,283
|
437
|
47.55%
|
592
|
46.14%
|
351
|
211
|
493
|
85
|
40.28%
|
224
|
45.44%
|
354
|
948
|
1,304
|
440
|
46.41%
|
549
|
42.10%
|
356
|
167
|
498
|
78
|
46.71%
|
228
|
45.78%
|
358
|
552
|
1,481
|
225
|
40.76%
|
678
|
45.78%
|
360
|
768
|
1,144
|
356
|
46.35%
|
513
|
44.84%
|
362
|
505
|
982
|
221
|
43.76%
|
448
|
45.62%
|
363
|
391
|
511
|
162
|
41.43%
|
211
|
41.29%
|
364
|
924
|
1,051
|
427
|
46.21%
|
491
|
46.72%
|
365
|
411
|
441
|
220
|
53.53%
|
217
|
49.21%
|
366
|
997
|
1,435
|
460
|
46.14%
|
651
|
45.37%
|
367
|
1,412
|
1,395
|
654
|
46.32%
|
655
|
46.95%
|
368
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
H230
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
442
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||
Total Vote
|
17,305
|
21,234
|
8,073
|
46.65%
|
9,477
|
44.63%
|
Bold/Italic Precincts=split precincts
% Rep V Gov=Percentage of vote for Abbott
that was the straight-ticket vote.
% Dem V Gov=Percentage of vote for Davis
that was the straight-ticket vote.
Predicting
turnout is especially tricky during the December holiday season. Perhaps
knowing the early voting total on December 12th will help, but the
accuracy of any prediction is questionable. However, I’ll try. In the November
general election in District 8, the early vote constituted 60 percent of the
total vote. I’m assuming that the percentage will be approximately the same in
the runoff election. If the assumption is correct and early vote in the
district is 8,901 (see table 2), then total vote will be 14,835, which is 68.88
percent of the total vote in the general election.
Table 2: Early Vote Estimate for District 8 from the Travis County
Clerk’s Web site
Early Votes
|
RV
|
% TO
|
|
301
|
47
|
505
|
9.31%
|
302
|
157
|
599
|
26.21%
|
303
|
64
|
42
|
152.38%
|
304
|
705
|
4,281
|
16.47%
|
307
|
104
|
379
|
27.44%
|
314
|
330
|
2,397
|
13.77%
|
315
|
424
|
2,294
|
18.48%
|
317
|
179
|
1,147
|
15.61%
|
330
|
6
|
71
|
8.45%
|
339
|
397
|
1,887
|
21.04%
|
347
|
605
|
2,873
|
21.06%
|
349
|
710
|
4,993
|
14.22%
|
351
|
226
|
2,012
|
11.23%
|
354
|
841
|
4,498
|
18.70%
|
356
|
141
|
2,052
|
6.87%
|
358
|
605
|
4,875
|
12.41%
|
360
|
663
|
4,368
|
15.18%
|
362
|
578
|
2,956
|
19.55%
|
363
|
370
|
1,609
|
23.00%
|
365
|
80
|
1,107
|
7.23%
|
366
|
775
|
4,875
|
15.90%
|
367
|
894
|
5,531
|
16.16%
|
368
|
0
|
0
|
0.00%
|
Total
|
8,901
|
55,351
|
16.08%
|
Does not include Precincts 338 & 364, which are split
precincts with 17 registered voters.
|
|||
Does not include Hays County precincts, which contains no City
of Austin registered voters.
|
|||
Portions of Precincts 301 and 303 are outside of the City of
Austin.
|
Who votes determines the composition
of the electorate. Which party’s identifiers were more motivated? Which
candidate had a better ground game—voter contacts and methods of mobilizing
voters? Which candidate will win? The answer to that question comes Tuesday
night, December 16th.
No comments:
Post a Comment