Saturday, December 13, 2014

Partisanship in a Nonpartisan Election



Although Austin city council elections are nonpartisan, the highly-charged politics that envelop Austin have turned several city council runoffs into partisan affairs. In southwest Austin, District 8 candidates Ellen Troxclair and Ed Scruggs epitomize the partisan conflict also evident in some other districts. In a recent Austin American-Statesmen, Marty Toohey highlights the nature of the conflict by listing the endorsements for each candidate:

Their endorsements further underscore their differences. Scruggs’ include Central Austin Democrats, the Austin Progressive Coalition, and the next Travis County judge, Sarah Eckhardt, a hard-charging liberal who won her November election in a landslide. Troxclair’s include Republican Travis County Commissioner Gerald Daugherty, the Home Builders Association of Greater Austin and a rare local endorsement from Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, Michael Quinn Sullivan’s influential group; one of her campaign fliers encouraged voters to pick Republicans Greg Abbott (for governor), Dan Patrick (for lieutenant governor) and herself.
In the November 4 election, Troxclair won a position in the runoff election by garnering 26.38 percent of the vote. Ed Scruggs won 25.55 percent of the vote, which secured him a place in the runoff. Of the five candidates in District 8, there were two Republicans—Troxclair and Bray—and three Democrats—Scruggs, Pierce, and May. Of the five candidates, only two emphasized their partisanship, and they were the candidates who will compete in the runoff election.



Since this is the first runoff election under the 10-1 plan, there are many unknowns: What will be the turnout? What will be the composition of the electorate? Which party is favored in the district? I’ll consider each question, starting with the one about which we know the most—the last question. According to the Austin American-Statesman, District 8 is a swing district. Indeed, in 2012, President Barack Obama won 51.54 percent of the vote to Romney’s 48.46 percent. However, in 2014, Democrat Wendy Davis won the district with 55.10 percent of the vote to Republican Greg Abbott’s 44.90 percent of the vote. Table 1 shows the 2014 gubernatorial vote in each of the precincts in the district:

Table 1: Gubernatorial Vote in City of Austin District 8 in 2014.
Voter Precinct
Greg Abbott
Wendy
Davis
ST
Rep
% RV
Gov
ST
Dem
% DV Gov
301
164
346
74
45.12%
170
49.13%
302
759
780
322
42.42%
324
41.54%
303
742
684
361
48.65%
319
46.64%
304
1,041
1,095
493
47.36%
448
40.91%
307
434
459
182
41.94%
242
52.72%
314
1,451
811
834
57.48%
337
41.55%
315
843
1,001
395
46.86%
408
40.76%
317
729
725
321
44.03%
310
42.76%
330
806
649
353
43.80%
280
43.14%
338
1,119
1,266
554
49.51%
585
46.21%
339
311
627
135
43.41%
269
42.90%
347
701
773
284
40.51%
328
42.43%
349
919
1,283
437
47.55%
592
46.14%
351
211
493
85
40.28%
224
45.44%
354
948
1,304
440
46.41%
549
42.10%
356
167
498
78
46.71%
228
45.78%
358
552
1,481
225
40.76%
678
45.78%
360
768
1,144
356
46.35%
513
44.84%
362
505
982
221
43.76%
448
45.62%
363
391
511
162
41.43%
211
41.29%
364
924
1,051
427
46.21%
491
46.72%
365
411
441
220
53.53%
217
49.21%
366
997
1,435
460
46.14%
651
45.37%
367
1,412
1,395
654
46.32%
655
46.95%
368
0
0
0

0

H230
0
0
0

0

442
0
0
0

0

Total Vote
17,305
21,234
8,073
46.65%
9,477
44.63%
Bold/Italic Precincts=split precincts
% Rep V Gov=Percentage of vote for Abbott that was the straight-ticket vote.
% Dem V Gov=Percentage of vote for Davis that was the straight-ticket vote.

Predicting turnout is especially tricky during the December holiday season. Perhaps knowing the early voting total on December 12th will help, but the accuracy of any prediction is questionable. However, I’ll try. In the November general election in District 8, the early vote constituted 60 percent of the total vote. I’m assuming that the percentage will be approximately the same in the runoff election. If the assumption is correct and early vote in the district is 8,901 (see table 2), then total vote will be 14,835, which is 68.88 percent of the total vote in the general election.   
Table 2: Early Vote Estimate for District 8 from the Travis County Clerk’s Web site
Early Votes
RV
% TO
301
47
505
9.31%
302
157
599
26.21%
303
64
42
152.38%
304
705
4,281
16.47%
307
104
379
27.44%
314
330
2,397
13.77%
315
424
2,294
18.48%
317
179
1,147
15.61%
330
6
71
8.45%
339
397
1,887
21.04%
347
605
2,873
21.06%
349
710
4,993
14.22%
351
226
2,012
11.23%
354
841
4,498
18.70%
356
141
2,052
6.87%
358
605
4,875
12.41%
360
663
4,368
15.18%
362
578
2,956
19.55%
363
370
1,609
23.00%
365
80
1,107
7.23%
366
775
4,875
15.90%
367
894
5,531
16.16%
368
0
0
0.00%
Total
8,901
55,351
16.08%




Does not include Precincts 338 & 364, which are split precincts with 17 registered voters.
Does not include Hays County precincts, which contains no City of Austin registered voters.
Portions of Precincts 301 and 303 are outside of the City of Austin.
Who votes determines the composition of the electorate. Which party’s identifiers were more motivated? Which candidate had a better ground game—voter contacts and methods of mobilizing voters? Which candidate will win? The answer to that question comes Tuesday night, December 16th.

No comments:

Post a Comment