The Soap Opera That is the Austin ICRC

 Just when you thought that it couldn't get worse (you know the rest). At the April 23rd meeting of the Austin Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (ICRC), the twelve commissioners attending the meeting attempted to replace the commissioner who resigned because she was not qualified.

After discussing the various possible appointees from the list of 60 Most Qualified Applicants, the group settled on two possible candidates: Isa Boonto-Zarifis and John McKiernan-Gonzalez. After discussing the merits of each candidate, the vote was conducted. The result was a tie vote; each candidate received six votes. The Austin City Charter requires a vote of nine members to replace a member of the Commission. The Commission has failed to hold a meeting since the April 23 debacle.

But there's more. One of the commissioners, Hoang Le, who resided in SMD 8 when he applied and was selected to the Commission, now resides, according to his voter registration information, in SMD 3, which means that SMD 8 has no representation on the Commission.

The Austin City Charter [Article II, Paragraph 3, (I) (9)] states: ". . .  As for the redistricting in each year ending in the number one thereafter, the eight commissioners shall ensure that at least one commission member resides in each of the then current council districts, to the extent feasible with the remaining six open seats." This means that there is no resident of SMD 8 currently on the Commission.

The Commissioners can remedy this situation by selecting the final commissioner from the several SMD 8 residents among the 60 Most Quality Applicants.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Whither the Republican Party?

Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes write in The Atlantic magazine: So we arrive at a syllogism: (1) The GOP has become the party of Trumpism. (2) Trumpism is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. (3) The Republican Party is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. A syllogism is, according to dictionary.com: 1. Logic. an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises, of which one (major premise) contains the term (major term) that is the predicate of the conclusion, and the other (minor premise) contains the term (minor term) that is the subject of the conclusion; common to both premises is a term (middle term) that is excluded from the conclusion. A typical form is “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”. 2. deductive reasoning. 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. Which definition applies here?   First, has the GOP become the party of Trump? Has he taken control of the party appa...
Read more

Choices for the Final Four (ICRC Commissions, that is)

Image
With four commission positions remaining to be filled, whom should the commissioners select? The commissioners should choose an African American male from TCCC precinct 1. Since the greatest concentrations of African Americans are located in TCCC precinct 1 (see this map ), choosing an African American from this geographic area would provide the greatest voice to the area with the highest concentration of African Americans in the city and the area that would most likely be included in a council district that would possess a plurality of African Americans. The choice should Nathaniel Bradford because of his connections to the community. An Anglo male and an Anglo female should be chosen from TCCC precinct 2. One, if not both, should be chosen from those voter precincts slightly east and west of MOPAC that featured high voter turnout in the 2012 mayoral election (see this map ). The male and female from those voting precincts who the ARP considered the most qualified are He...
Read more

In Defense of a Theory

I’m a big fan of political scientist Seth Masket, but what he wrote in defense of the theory of presidential nominations expounded in The Party Decides intrigues me. First, he notes that his initial defense caused some blowback: Last week at Mischiefs of Faction , I wrote about the book The Party Decides and the extent to which the 2016 is causing trouble for it. I argued that the Republican race isn't providing a very clean test of the theory, while the Democratic race is. This invited substantial pushback from Jonathan Chait , Justin Grimmer , and others, suggesting that I was either protecting the theory from actual testing, or that the theory itself was untestable. So I'd like to clarify a bit and suggest just what evidence we've gathered this year. Then, he goes on to explain more fully: Now, in my recent post, I focused on what I see as the central claim of the book: The party generally gets what it wants. That is, when party elites have selected a...
Read more