Thursday, April 22, 2021

Austin Election on Eight Propositions

 On May 1, 2021, Austin residents will vote on eight propositions, many of which will alter the Austin City Charter. Probably the most contentious issue involves reinstating a camping ban in Austin, which would make camping in public spaces a class "C" misdemeanor. The only penalty is a fine; however, since homeless persons cannot pay the fine, a warrant for the person's arrest will be issued. It does nothing to solve the homeless situation in Austin. 

Many of the issues deal with changing the Austin City Charter. The most significant change would change the form of municipal governance in Austin from the Council-Manager form to a Strong Mayor-Council form. The justification for this proposition is to make the operation of municipal government in Austin more accountable to the residents. Another proposition moves the mayoral election from non-presidential general election years to presidential general election years. The mayor would still serve a four-year term. However, proponents argue that the mayor will be subjected to more pressure to abide by the residents' opinions than the current city manager is. The city manager can be removed by the City Council now, but proponents of this change don't think that the pressure is enough on the city manager to force compliance with the citizens' desires. 

Two proposals were considered by an Austin Charter Review Commission two years ago and rejected by the commission; however, they are on this ballot. One proposal would establish Ranked Choice Voting for council elections if allowed by the Texas legislature. Ranked Choice Voting allows each voter to rank the candidates for an office in order of preference. If no candidate receives a majority of the vote for the first place votes for the office, the candidate with the fewest first place votes is eliminated, and the second place votes of those voters are distributed to the remaining candidates. If no candidate receives a majority of the votes, the process is repeated until a candidate receives a majority of the votes. This system eliminates the need for run-off elections, which occur in December currently and have very low voter turnout percentages. Furthermore, there is less negative campaigning since the candidates is trying to garner as many first place votes as possible and all voters' ballots are important. The other proposal would create a Democracy Dollars program that would send every registered voter in Austin two $26 certificates that could be contributed to a candidate for mayor (one certificate) and to a candidate in his or her council district (one certificate). The cost is a major impediment to the approval of this measure. However, cities that employ this system, such as Seattle, Washington, have experienced an increase in candidates for council positions who would not have the resources to compete otherwise. 

Unfortunately, voter turnout will be low. So far, after three days of early voting (one-third of the total days of early voting), voter turnout in Travis County is only 3.35 percent of registered voters. I would be surprised if turnout exceeds 20 percent of registered voters.

Early voting ends on April 27th, and Election Day is Saturday, May 1st. If you haven't voted, please exercise your right to vote.

Voter Guides are here.

Friday, April 9, 2021

SNAFU at the Austin Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission

At today's meeting of the Austin ICRC, the Austin Auditor's Office explained that there was a glitch in the selection process for the commission. The result was five applicants for the commission being deemed unqualified when the five were actually qualified. In addition, five applicants who were not qualified were deemed qualified. So ten applicants were not categorized correctly by the Austin Auditor's Office.

Since one of the applicants who was not qualified was selected  in the March meeting by the eight commissioners who were selected randomly, the commission was required to select a replacement. In addition, another applicant selected for the commission was not qualified, but the Auditor's Office, after consulting with Austin's Legal Office, decided that the applicant would need to be replaced by the thirteen commissioners at the next meeting.

The commission debated the possible replacements among the 60 most qualified applicants and chose Salina R. Yee, who resides in District 1, is Asian American, has a bachelor's degree, is female, and is between 35 and 44 years of age. 

Here are the thirteen members who are now a part of the commission.


The two unqualified commissioners were Anika Keswani and Nuria Zaragosa. Looking forward to the next meeting.