Early Voting in the Texas Democratic and Republican Primaries

With the completion of early voting the Texas primary elections, we can get some idea of what voter turnout will be after Election Day on Tuesday, March 3, 2020. The Republican primary garnered, as usual, more voters than the Democratic primary, although one might have thought that with no real contest in the nomination of a presidential candidate in the Republican primary and a plethora of candidates in the Democratic contest to secure the presidential nomination, there would be higher participation rates in the Democratic primary.

So what were the levels of participation during early voting? In the Republican primary, 1,085,144 voters participated, which constitutes 6.69 percent of Texas' registered voters. In the Democratic primary, 1,000,288 voters participated, which is 6.17 percent of Texas' 16,211,198 registered voters.

How does this translate into a total participation rate for each political party? In most Texas elections, the early vote constitutes about 60 percent of the total vote cast. However, in the 2018 Democratic primary, that percentage was lower (54.81 percent of the total vote). If we assume that the early vote constitutes between 53 and 56 percent of the total vote cast, then the Republican primary total vote would between 1,937,757 and 2,047,442, and the Democratic primary total vote would be between  1,786,229 and 1,887,336. The actual voter turnout, with 99 percent of the vote counted, was 2,006,978 for the Republican primary election, and 2,076,046 for the Democratic primary election.

Derek Ryan, who lives in Austin and is a political consultant, publishes a very interesting report during early voting, gathering data from the 30 Texas counties with the largest number of registered voters. His data provide information about party, gender, and age of voters in the primary. Note who voted by previous election history and each party's voters by age and gender.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Whither the Republican Party?

Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes write in The Atlantic magazine: So we arrive at a syllogism: (1) The GOP has become the party of Trumpism. (2) Trumpism is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. (3) The Republican Party is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. A syllogism is, according to dictionary.com: 1. Logic. an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises, of which one (major premise) contains the term (major term) that is the predicate of the conclusion, and the other (minor premise) contains the term (minor term) that is the subject of the conclusion; common to both premises is a term (middle term) that is excluded from the conclusion. A typical form is “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”. 2. deductive reasoning. 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. Which definition applies here?   First, has the GOP become the party of Trump? Has he taken control of the party appa...
Read more

Choices for the Final Four (ICRC Commissions, that is)

Image
With four commission positions remaining to be filled, whom should the commissioners select? The commissioners should choose an African American male from TCCC precinct 1. Since the greatest concentrations of African Americans are located in TCCC precinct 1 (see this map ), choosing an African American from this geographic area would provide the greatest voice to the area with the highest concentration of African Americans in the city and the area that would most likely be included in a council district that would possess a plurality of African Americans. The choice should Nathaniel Bradford because of his connections to the community. An Anglo male and an Anglo female should be chosen from TCCC precinct 2. One, if not both, should be chosen from those voter precincts slightly east and west of MOPAC that featured high voter turnout in the 2012 mayoral election (see this map ). The male and female from those voting precincts who the ARP considered the most qualified are He...
Read more

In Defense of a Theory

I’m a big fan of political scientist Seth Masket, but what he wrote in defense of the theory of presidential nominations expounded in The Party Decides intrigues me. First, he notes that his initial defense caused some blowback: Last week at Mischiefs of Faction , I wrote about the book The Party Decides and the extent to which the 2016 is causing trouble for it. I argued that the Republican race isn't providing a very clean test of the theory, while the Democratic race is. This invited substantial pushback from Jonathan Chait , Justin Grimmer , and others, suggesting that I was either protecting the theory from actual testing, or that the theory itself was untestable. So I'd like to clarify a bit and suggest just what evidence we've gathered this year. Then, he goes on to explain more fully: Now, in my recent post, I focused on what I see as the central claim of the book: The party generally gets what it wants. That is, when party elites have selected a...
Read more