Texas Commission on Judicial Selection


The 86th Texas Legislature created a commission to study the partisan election of judges in Texas. The specific charge to the commission:


The study must consider the fairness, effectiveness, and desirability of selecting a judicial officer through partisan elections; the fairness, effectiveness, and desirability of judicial selection methods proposed or adopted by other states; the relative merits of alternative methods for selecting a judicial officer.

The TCJS is required to submit a report on its findings and recommendations to the governor and the legislature no later than December 31, 2020.

The commission held its first meeting on January 9, 2020. During that meeting, the chair—David Beck—introduced the members and formed three subcommittees—Appointments and Confirmations Committee, Citizens Panels and Judicial Qualifications Committee, and Elections Committee. The fifteen members of the Commission, who were appointed by the Governor (4 members), Lieutenant Governor (4 members), the Speaker of the House (4 members), the Texas Supreme Court (1 member), Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (1 member), and the State Bar of Texas (1 member). Among the members are two Texas Supreme Court Chief Justices—Tom Phillips and Wallace Jefferson—four members of the Texas Senate, and four members of the Texas House of Representatives. The list of members is here.


The committee meetings are scheduled monthly from February through August 2020. The committee meetings are yet to be determined. The Commissions meeting schedule is here.


My interest in Texas judicial elections was sparked by the election of Steven Wayne Smith to the Texas Supreme Court in 2002. He defeated a Hispanic justice, Xavier Rodriguez, who had been appointed to fill a vacancy by Governor Rick Perry in 2001. Smith was elected in 2002 but was defeated in his first reelection bid in 2002. Smith was well-known in Texas Republican Party circles as the lawyer that won the Hopwood case that ended the affirmative action admissions program at the University of Texas.


For background on judicial selection in Texas, I highly recommend Mark Jones’ paper, which notes the importance of straight-ticket voting on judicial elections. I have also included the selection of judges in my Reports #11 and #14 on straight-ticket voting for the Center for Public Policy and Political Studies (CPPPS).


The Commission’s meetings and final report should be very interesting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Whither the Republican Party?

Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes write in The Atlantic magazine: So we arrive at a syllogism: (1) The GOP has become the party of Trumpism. (2) Trumpism is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. (3) The Republican Party is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. A syllogism is, according to dictionary.com: 1. Logic. an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises, of which one (major premise) contains the term (major term) that is the predicate of the conclusion, and the other (minor premise) contains the term (minor term) that is the subject of the conclusion; common to both premises is a term (middle term) that is excluded from the conclusion. A typical form is “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”. 2. deductive reasoning. 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. Which definition applies here?   First, has the GOP become the party of Trump? Has he taken control of the party appa...
Read more

Choices for the Final Four (ICRC Commissions, that is)

Image
With four commission positions remaining to be filled, whom should the commissioners select? The commissioners should choose an African American male from TCCC precinct 1. Since the greatest concentrations of African Americans are located in TCCC precinct 1 (see this map ), choosing an African American from this geographic area would provide the greatest voice to the area with the highest concentration of African Americans in the city and the area that would most likely be included in a council district that would possess a plurality of African Americans. The choice should Nathaniel Bradford because of his connections to the community. An Anglo male and an Anglo female should be chosen from TCCC precinct 2. One, if not both, should be chosen from those voter precincts slightly east and west of MOPAC that featured high voter turnout in the 2012 mayoral election (see this map ). The male and female from those voting precincts who the ARP considered the most qualified are He...
Read more

In Defense of a Theory

I’m a big fan of political scientist Seth Masket, but what he wrote in defense of the theory of presidential nominations expounded in The Party Decides intrigues me. First, he notes that his initial defense caused some blowback: Last week at Mischiefs of Faction , I wrote about the book The Party Decides and the extent to which the 2016 is causing trouble for it. I argued that the Republican race isn't providing a very clean test of the theory, while the Democratic race is. This invited substantial pushback from Jonathan Chait , Justin Grimmer , and others, suggesting that I was either protecting the theory from actual testing, or that the theory itself was untestable. So I'd like to clarify a bit and suggest just what evidence we've gathered this year. Then, he goes on to explain more fully: Now, in my recent post, I focused on what I see as the central claim of the book: The party generally gets what it wants. That is, when party elites have selected a...
Read more