Who Voted in the 2018 Texas Primaries?


Derek Ryan, Ryan Data in Austin, Texas, provided a report on the voters in Texas’ 2018 primary election. I have copied some of the charts and tables and created an additional chart for commentary.



Source: Ryan Data

Considering who voted in each party’s primary, nearly four-fifths of Republican primary voters were voters who had previously only voted in Republican primary elections. On the other hand, about two-thirds of Democrats were voters who had previously only voted in Democratic primary elections. For Republicans, just over one-tenth of primary voters were first-time primary participants. On the other hand, just over one-fifth of Democratic primary voters were first-time primary participants. Furthermore, only 2.2 percent of historical Democratic primary voters switched to vote in the Republican primary election. Meanwhile, 4.6 percent of historical Republican primary voters switched to vote in the Democratic primary election.

Another table in Ryan’s report indicates that turnout among voters who had participated in all four primary elections between 2010 and 2016 had the highest turnout.


Source: Data from Ryan Data, Chart created by the author

In age, Republican primary voters were concentrated in the older age categories. A majority of Republican primary voters were 60 years old or older. A majority of Democratic primary voters were less than 60 years old. The percentage of voters who were younger than 40 years old among the Democratic primary voters was more than double the percentage of voters who were younger than 40 years old among the Republican primary voters.


Source: Data from Ryan Data, Chart created by the author 

The gender gap is large and significant for the future of partisanship in Texas after 2018.


Source: Ryan Data

In late 2017, Ed Espinoza, executive director of Progress Texas, published a six-part series entitled “Flipping Texas in 2018,” in which he identified the two sleeping giants that will produce a new era in partisanship in Texas. The 2018 primary election provides evidence for his predictions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Whither the Republican Party?

Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes write in The Atlantic magazine: So we arrive at a syllogism: (1) The GOP has become the party of Trumpism. (2) Trumpism is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. (3) The Republican Party is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. A syllogism is, according to dictionary.com: 1. Logic. an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises, of which one (major premise) contains the term (major term) that is the predicate of the conclusion, and the other (minor premise) contains the term (minor term) that is the subject of the conclusion; common to both premises is a term (middle term) that is excluded from the conclusion. A typical form is “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”. 2. deductive reasoning. 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. Which definition applies here?   First, has the GOP become the party of Trump? Has he taken control of the party appa...
Read more

Choices for the Final Four (ICRC Commissions, that is)

Image
With four commission positions remaining to be filled, whom should the commissioners select? The commissioners should choose an African American male from TCCC precinct 1. Since the greatest concentrations of African Americans are located in TCCC precinct 1 (see this map ), choosing an African American from this geographic area would provide the greatest voice to the area with the highest concentration of African Americans in the city and the area that would most likely be included in a council district that would possess a plurality of African Americans. The choice should Nathaniel Bradford because of his connections to the community. An Anglo male and an Anglo female should be chosen from TCCC precinct 2. One, if not both, should be chosen from those voter precincts slightly east and west of MOPAC that featured high voter turnout in the 2012 mayoral election (see this map ). The male and female from those voting precincts who the ARP considered the most qualified are He...
Read more

In Defense of a Theory

I’m a big fan of political scientist Seth Masket, but what he wrote in defense of the theory of presidential nominations expounded in The Party Decides intrigues me. First, he notes that his initial defense caused some blowback: Last week at Mischiefs of Faction , I wrote about the book The Party Decides and the extent to which the 2016 is causing trouble for it. I argued that the Republican race isn't providing a very clean test of the theory, while the Democratic race is. This invited substantial pushback from Jonathan Chait , Justin Grimmer , and others, suggesting that I was either protecting the theory from actual testing, or that the theory itself was untestable. So I'd like to clarify a bit and suggest just what evidence we've gathered this year. Then, he goes on to explain more fully: Now, in my recent post, I focused on what I see as the central claim of the book: The party generally gets what it wants. That is, when party elites have selected a...
Read more