Comparing the 2014 and 2016 Electorates in Texas



Everyone knows that midterm election voters differ from presidential election voters. First, voter turnout is higher in presidential years. Second, voters in midterm elections are more interested in politics and more partisan. Third, voters in midterm elections differ demographically from voters in presidential elections. Using exit polls from the 2014 midterm election and the 2016 presidential election, let’s compare the voters.

First, in terms of voter turnout, only 4,727,181 Texans voted—28.29 percent of the voting eligible population (VEP) —in the 2014 gubernatorial election in Texas. In 2016, 8,909,497 Texans—50.98 percent of the VEP—voted in the 2016 presidential election in Texas. The charts depict the difference in participation levels:



To compare the electorates demographically, we’ll use exit polls. The tables compare the electorate in terms of race/ethnicity, party identification, ideology, education, gender, age, and income. Note the salient differences.


 





















Ethnicity: Note that the Anglo percentage of the voters was much higher in 2014 than in 2016 (66% vs. 57%). On the other hand, the Hispanic percentage was much lower in 2014 than in 2016 (17% vs. 24%). Furthermore, the percentage of the Asian American vote, which was not calculated in 2014, was 5 percent in 2016. There was no real change in the percentage of the African American vote.

Partisanship: The percentage of Democrats was higher in 2016 than in 2014 (29% vs. 27%); the percentage of independents was slighter lower in 2016 than in 2014 (33% vs. 35%); the percentage of Republicans was the same in both elections (38%).

Ideology: Differences in ideology were similar to differences in partisanship. Liberals were a slightly higher percentage in 2016 than in 2014 (20% vs. 18%). The percentage of moderates was lower in 2016 than in 2014 (36% vs. 38%). The percentage of conservatives was the same in both elections (44%).

Education: There is little difference in the data; however, comparison is made difficult by the use of a different category for less educated voters (HS graduate vs. HS or less). The percentages of college graduates and postgraduates are higher in 2014 than in 2016 (38% vs. 34% and 19% vs. 17%, respectively). 

 



















Gender: The female percentage of the voters in 2016 was higher in 2016 than in 2014 (54% vs. 51%).

Age: The youngest age category constituted a higher percentage of the voters in 2016 than in 2014 (10% vs. 6%). There was no difference in the percentage of 25-29-year-olds between 2014 and 2016. Among 30-39-year-olds, there was a slight increase in 2016 over 2014 (19% vs. 17%). There were fewer 50-64-year-olds and 65 and older voters in 2016 than in 2014 (28% vs. 32% and 19% vs. 15%, respectively).

Income: There were fewer voters in the $50K-$100K category in 2016 than in 2014 (31% vs. 39%). There were more voters in the 200K and higher category in 2016 than in 2014 (13% vs. 9%).

What conclusions do you draw from the data?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Whither the Republican Party?

Jonathan Rauch and Benjamin Wittes write in The Atlantic magazine: So we arrive at a syllogism: (1) The GOP has become the party of Trumpism. (2) Trumpism is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. (3) The Republican Party is a threat to democratic values and the rule of law. A syllogism is, according to dictionary.com: 1. Logic. an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises, of which one (major premise) contains the term (major term) that is the predicate of the conclusion, and the other (minor premise) contains the term (minor term) that is the subject of the conclusion; common to both premises is a term (middle term) that is excluded from the conclusion. A typical form is “All A is C; all B is A; therefore, all B is C.”. 2. deductive reasoning. 3. an extremely subtle, sophisticated, or deceptive argument. Which definition applies here?   First, has the GOP become the party of Trump? Has he taken control of the party appa...
Read more

Choices for the Final Four (ICRC Commissions, that is)

Image
With four commission positions remaining to be filled, whom should the commissioners select? The commissioners should choose an African American male from TCCC precinct 1. Since the greatest concentrations of African Americans are located in TCCC precinct 1 (see this map ), choosing an African American from this geographic area would provide the greatest voice to the area with the highest concentration of African Americans in the city and the area that would most likely be included in a council district that would possess a plurality of African Americans. The choice should Nathaniel Bradford because of his connections to the community. An Anglo male and an Anglo female should be chosen from TCCC precinct 2. One, if not both, should be chosen from those voter precincts slightly east and west of MOPAC that featured high voter turnout in the 2012 mayoral election (see this map ). The male and female from those voting precincts who the ARP considered the most qualified are He...
Read more

In Defense of a Theory

I’m a big fan of political scientist Seth Masket, but what he wrote in defense of the theory of presidential nominations expounded in The Party Decides intrigues me. First, he notes that his initial defense caused some blowback: Last week at Mischiefs of Faction , I wrote about the book The Party Decides and the extent to which the 2016 is causing trouble for it. I argued that the Republican race isn't providing a very clean test of the theory, while the Democratic race is. This invited substantial pushback from Jonathan Chait , Justin Grimmer , and others, suggesting that I was either protecting the theory from actual testing, or that the theory itself was untestable. So I'd like to clarify a bit and suggest just what evidence we've gathered this year. Then, he goes on to explain more fully: Now, in my recent post, I focused on what I see as the central claim of the book: The party generally gets what it wants. That is, when party elites have selected a...
Read more